Browning M2HB
Notes: Known
affectionately by US troops as the “Ma Deuce” or just “The Fifty,” the M2HB was
originally introduced in 1923 as the M1921.
Though when the M2HB was first designed, shortly after World War 1, it
was meant to be an antitank weapon, development of tank armor quickly made this
idea obsolete. However, since the
M2HB was still a fantastic antipersonnel, antiaircraft, and anti-light
armor/soft-skinned vehicle weapon, development of what would become the M2HB
continued, and it has since become the primary commander’s machinegun on most
Western armored vehicles.
Especially during the World War 2 and the Korean War, it was also the primary
armament for aircraft on virtually all US aircraft and many Allied aircraft as
well. The M2HB is still
manufactured in the US by General Dynamics (and formerly by Saco), in Belgium by
FNH (where most are manufactured today), in Britain by Manroy, and to a limited
extent by other countries around the world.
Many other companies and countries also make spare parts for the M2HB.
Despite recurring rumors of its impending replacement by several newer
designs over the years, and despite the fact that the M2HB is one of the oldest
small arms designs still in use in the world, it does seem that the M2HB will be
around for a long time to come.
The M2HB is
tough, heavy, and robust; I’ve personally seen vehicles basically totaled in
rollovers, but their externally-mounted M2HBs were able to be put back into
service after just a simple cleaning.
Operation is by short-recoil; feed is normally from the left, but a
qualified armorer can reverse this.
Ammunition boxes can be mounted on a tray which attaches to the M2HB or its
tripod. Originally, both air-cooled
and water-jacketed models were made; the water jacket proved to be unnecessary,
though that version was used until just after World War 2 as an antiaircraft
weapon. The heavy barrel is 45
inches long and though it does have a sort of crowned muzzle, there is no sort
of flash suppressor or muzzle brake.
Sights are a simple blade at the front of the receiver and an adjustable
folding leaf sight at the rear of the receiver; when the rear sight is folded,
an adjustable aperture sight is used.
There have also been over the years a large amount of basically
jury-rigged mounts for various sorts of optics and night vision devices.
(The famous Marine Scout/Sniper Carlos Hathcock, holder of the world
record for long-distance sniping until recent years, made his longest shot with
a scoped M2HB set on semiautomatic.)
There is no stock or conventional trigger mechanism; instead, the M2HB is
fired using spade grips and a butterfly-type thumb trigger.
The M2HB is designed only to be fired from vehicular, aircraft, tripod,
or pintle mounts. (I know many of
you have seen war movies where the hero picks up an M2HB and hip-fires it, but I
assure you that this is quite impossible!)
Just under the trigger is a cylinder/dial; this is in effect a selector
device. One rotates it to the right
and locks it to allow semiautomatic fire.
However, the
M2HB does have a defect, and it can be a significant one: the variable headspace
and timing, which must be adjusted perfectly to allow proper functioning and
prevents any sort of quick changing of the barrel.
The headspace and timing can also go out of adjustment simply from the
vibrations of the M2HB as it fires.
Adjusting headspace and timing on an M2HB is a difficult and, quite frankly,
annoying procedure that takes a lot of practice (and continuing practice) in
order to do quickly; a lot of troops literally never manage to do it quite
right. And if you don’t adjust the
headspace and timing properly, you can end up with an M2HB that may do anything
from refuse to fire at all to one that jams to one that rips brass in half as it
extracts. (I have seen a lot of
bizarre malfunctions in the M2HB, virtually all related in some way to incorrect
headspace and timing adjustments.)
M2HB QCB and M2A1
That said,
several countries have been making (for a long time) kits which convert the M2HB
into a configuration that gives it a quick-change barrel and eliminates the need
for the headspace and timing adjustments (the QCB, or Quick-Change Barrel kit,
in effect provides the M2HB with fixed headspace and timing which is optimized
for the weapon and round). Many
nations using the M2HB, including most NATO countries, have already installed
these kits into their M2HBs. The
US, however, as with many things, it a latecomer to the QCB bandwagon; the US
military has only recently selected a kit made by General Dynamics (a kit
originally designed by Saco Defense all the way back in 1978!) to update the
M2HBs already in service. For the
most part, this kit retains the configuration of the basic M2HB (except for the
modifications required to change it to a QCB configuration).
The new barrel’s bore, however, is Stellite-lined and chromium-plated.
The General Dynamics M2HB QCB may use standard M2HB barrels, but this
requires removal of the QCB parts and effectively turns it into a standard M2HB
requiring headspace and timing adjustments.
The General Dynamics M2HB QCB is slightly heavier, but its firing
characteristics are identical to a standard M2HB.
The US military
has recently, after experience in Iraq and Afghanistan, begun to upgrade their
M2HBs. This is also a sort of a
stopgap program due to the failure of the XM-312 and delays in the XM-806
(LW-50) programs. The upgrades that
turn the M2HB into an M2A1 can be issued as a kit to unit armorers, or
retrofitted to guns undergoing depot-level maintenance and refurbishment.
The M2A1 incorporates the improvements used by QCB kits by making the
headspace and timing fixed, and giving the M2A1 a quick-change barrel (it now
takes less than ten seconds to change a barrel).
The new barrel is the same length, but has heavy flash suppressor claimed
to reduce muzzle flash by 95%. The
bolt has been modified to make injury to soldiers less likely if the M2A1 is
improperly disassembled, it also increases the cyclic rate of fire to 600 rpm
(which unfortunately has no effect in game terms).
The M2A1 also has a trigger block safety in addition to the safety
setting on the selector. A length
of MIL-STD-1913 rail has been added to the top of the feed cover and rear end of
the barrel jacket. Weight is a bit more than for the M2HB, and the weapon is a
bit longer, but stats remain the same except for the Bulk.
FN Browning M1939
Just prior to
World War 2, FN began manufacturing a version of the M2HB in an even heavier
caliber. This was in response to
the interest by some possible export countries in a more powerful machinegun for
use in aircraft that was not as heavy as the crop of 20mm autocannons available
at the time, and FN felt they could nearly the damage of a 20mm cannon but in a
machinegun-sized gun. The
ammunition for the M1939 was a slight modification of the 13.2mm Hotchkiss
developed concurrently with the weapon and was primarily meant to be used with
APHE rounds, though ball and API rounds were also developed.
Tests of the M1939 yielded good results.
Unfortunately,
due to the invasion of Belgium in 1940, exports were made only to Romania and
Sweden, before FN engineers destroyed all plans, tooling, and examples at the FN
plant to deny them to the Nazis. FN
also sold the plans and blueprints of the gun and tooling to the Swedish at the
same time they made the sale to Sweden, and also gave the Swedes an export
license. Subsequently, the Swedes
sold them to Finland, though the Finns rechambered their M1939s back to .50 BMG.
The M1939 was designed for aircraft use and a ground-mounted model was never
designed. Due to the similarities between the cartridges, rechambering the M1939
for .50 BMG or vice versa requires only a barrel swap.
As most
countries using the M2HB series also produced or bought large amounts of .50 BMG
ammunition, most M1939s later sold on the export market or in use by initial
export customers were rechambered for .50 BMG rounds.
Twilight 2000
Notes: Virtually all M2HBs used by NATO, the US, and other US allies use QCB
kits; the one mentioned above was in fact put into high-rate production by Saco
Defense at the request of the Pentagon when the winds of war began to blow. The
M2A1 is not available in the Twilight 2000 timeline.
Weapon |
Ammunition |
Weight |
Magazines |
Price |
M2HB |
.50 Browning Machinegun |
38.01 kg |
105 Belt |
$9773 |
M2HB QCB |
.50 Browning Machinegun |
38.19 kg |
105 Belt |
$9820 |
M2A1 |
.50 Browning Machinegun |
38.2 kg |
105 Belt |
$10006 |
M1939 |
13.2mm Hotchkiss |
31.6 kg |
Special |
$10339 |
Weapon |
ROF |
Damage |
Pen |
Bulk |
SS |
Burst |
Range |
M2HB (With Tripod) |
5 |
9 |
2-2-3 |
11 |
1 |
3 |
397 |
M2A1 (With Tripod) |
5 |
9 |
2-2-3 |
14 |
1 |
3 |
397 |
M1939 |
10 |
9 |
2-3-4 |
11 |
* |
* |
294 |
Browning M1917
Notes:
After experimenting for a while with gas operation, John Browning decided
that recoil operation was far better for heavy automatic weapons and developed
the M1917 series of machineguns. He
had the design perfected by about 1910, but was unable to interest the US
military until World War 1, when the Army suddenly placed a huge order with
Browning.
The M1917 is
very similar in appearance to the Vickers and Maxim guns of the same time
period, though the Browning gun can be immediately identified by the pistol grip
at the rear. More than 68,000 were
made before the end of World War 1.
In 1936, the weapon was partially redesigned, with the feed mechanism being made
more reliable, the sights re-graduated to be more accurate, the tripod made
lighter, and other small changes were made.
This weapon became the M1917A1.
The M1917 is
water-cooled, and therefore unsuitable for aircraft operation.
The water jacket was removed, and lighter components were used whenever
possible, to create the M1918. The
M1919 is similar to the M1918, but was designed for use on tanks.
It also uses a heavier barrel than the M1917 or M1918. The M1919A1 is the
same weapon as the M1919, but designed specifically for the Mark VIII tank.
The M1919A2 is again similar, but with a normal weight barrel.
It was designed for horse cavalry, having a special small tripod and a
special saddle for transportation.
(It cannot be fired from the top of a horse!)
The M1919A3 was a prototype for the M1919A4 (below).
Weapon |
Ammunition |
Weight |
Magazines |
Price |
M1917 |
.30-06 Springfield |
14.97 kg (24.5 kg with water) |
250 Cloth Belt |
$2775 |
M1917A1 |
.30-06 Springfield |
14.22 kg (23.75 kg with water) |
250 Cloth Belt |
$2775 |
M1918 |
.30-06 Springfield |
13.92 kg |
250 Cloth Belt |
$2775 |
M1919 |
.30-06 Springfield |
14.28 kg |
250 Cloth Belt |
$2797 |
M1919A2 |
.30-06 Springfield |
14.23 kg |
250 Cloth Belt |
$2775 |
Weapon |
ROF |
Damage |
Pen |
Bulk |
SS |
Burst |
Range |
M1917 |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
8 |
1 |
1 |
142 |
M1917A1 |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
8 |
1 |
1 |
142 |
M1918 |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
6 |
1 |
1 |
142 |
M1919 |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
6 |
1 |
1 |
148 |
M1919A2 |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
6 |
1 |
1 |
142 |
Colt-Browning M1895
Notes:
This weapon was based on an original John Browning design.
He was trying to see whether the muzzle blast of an automatic weapon
could be put to any use. The result
was a weapon that was nicknamed by troops the “potato digger;” the weapon had a
swinging arm beneath the barrel that connected to a linkage that opened the
breech, and extracted the spent cartridge and loaded another.
This arm meant that the weapon could not be mounted too close to the
ground unless a pit was dug for the arm.
It was a very clumsy arrangement, but the recoil was very mild and the
action smooth. In the 1890s, large
numbers of the M1895 were bought by the US Navy in .30 Krag and 6mm Lee
calibers; the US Army used .30 Krag and later converted them to .30-06
Springfield. The M1895 was not used
in large numbers in World War 1, though they were used in large numbers for
training purposes until almost World War 2.
Note: The M1895 cannot be fired without a tripod or vehicle pintle mount.
Tripod weight is 6.1 kg.
Weapon |
Ammunition |
Weight |
Magazines |
Price |
M1895 |
6mm Lee Navy |
6.39 kg |
250 Cloth Belt |
$2107 |
M1895 |
.30-40 Krag |
9.64 kg |
250 Cloth Belt |
$2757 |
M1895 |
.30-06 Springfield |
10.34 kg |
250 Cloth Belt |
$2896 |
Weapon |
ROF |
Damage |
Pen |
Bulk |
SS |
Burst |
Range |
M1895 (6mm) |
5 |
4 |
2-Nil |
6 |
1 |
1 |
149 |
M1895 (.30-40) |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
6 |
1 |
1 |
191 |
M1895 (.30-06) |
5 |
5 |
2-3-Nil |
6 |
1 |
1 |
178 |
Notes: This is
an electrically driven 7.62N machinegun used on some US and British armored
vehicles. The weapon ejects spent
brass overboard and incorporates a fume extractor.
This weapon can also be used on a pintle mount, and is installed on some
light helicopters.
Weapon |
Ammunition |
Weight |
Magazines |
Price |
EX-34 (Long Barrel) |
7.62mm NATO |
17.86 kg |
100 Belt, 200 Belt, 1000 Belt |
$2560 |
EX-34 (Short Barrel) |
7.62mm NATO |
13.7 kg |
100 Belt, 200 Belt, 1000 Belt |
$2410 |
Weapon |
ROF |
Damage |
Pen |
Bulk |
SS |
Burst |
Range |
EX-34 (Long) |
10 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
8 |
1 |
3 |
192 |
EX-34 (Short) |
10 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
6 |
1 |
3 |
151 |
FNH USA M240
Notes: This is
the US variant of the Belgian MAG machinegun.
The first versions of the M240 appeared in US service as early as 1976 as
coaxial machineguns in US tanks, IFVs, and some other armored vehicles; however,
the first personnel and pintle-mounted models did not appear until 1994, when
the US Marines adopted the M240G.
At first, these M240Gs were excess US Army and Marine coaxial machineguns
modified for ground and pintle use, but these were quickly superseded with
purpose-built M240Gs. By 1996,
virtually all M-60s in US Marine use had been replaced by the M240G, as well as
many M-60s in use by the US Navy.
The Marines quickly developed a fondness for the M240G due to its reliability,
ruggedness, and easier field-stripping procedures (and, I suspect, because the
Marines rarely get first crack at anything new).
The US Army, noting these attributes, asked that a forward handguard be
added and called it the M240B; it is otherwise the same weapon.
That said, one
of the few complaints about the M240 is the size of the weapon; at 48.5 inches
long, it can be quite the handful for smaller shooters and even a detriment in
QCB. Otherwise, the M240 series has
had remarkably few complaints for weapons in US military use.
The M240 series does use a barrel a full 24.7 inches long, and is tipped
with a somewhat different flash suppressor than is used by its MAG ancestor.
The polymer stock is also different; it actually looks more like the
stocks used on current versions of the M249 than the standard MAG polymer stock,
and has folding shoulder plate to help support the weapon when used from the
bipod. Sights are also slightly
different; the front sight is a protected blade, while the rear is an adjustable
aperture sight, which may be flipped up to reveal a U-notch leaf sight.
Cyclic rate of fire has been slowed by about 50 rpm, primarily by use
recoil springs and buffers which are modified to suit US manufacturing methods.
The pistol grip also has a slightly different shape.
The M240G and B are otherwise essentially the same as the standard MAG,
except that the M240 is further modified to allow it to use M-60 tripods and
pintle mounts. The US military has
also adopted their own version of the MAG’s helicopter door-gun, called the
M240H; this version has spade grips and a thumb trigger instead of the pistol
grip and standard trigger group, no bipod, and no handguard.
This version can also be mounted on tripods and ground vehicle pintle
mounts.
In early 2000,
improvements were made to lighten the M240, resulting in a reduction in weight
of 1.36 kg. Starting in 2005,
studies were undertaken to lighten the M240 even further; this entailed
replacing the receiver with one made from a titanium/steel alloy, and possibly
in the future replacing plastic and polymer parts with ones made from advanced
carbon-fiber composites, and even the bipod by one made from titanium/steel
alloy. Currently (early 2006), some 20 examples of the titanium/steel receiver
version have been procured for testing; designated the M240E6, they are lighter
than the standard M240B and G models by some 1.81 kg.
Target weight reductions for further models call for a total lightening
of the weapon by 3.18 kg. It is not
known whether this study will lead to a future operational version of the M240,
but the soldiers testing it seem to be enthusiastic about the reductions in
weight, and one of the complaints coming out of Iraq and Afghanistan about the
standard M240 is the weight of the weapon.
There is a concern that these weight reductions may literally make the
M240 too light for controllability and adjustments may have to be made to the
buffer system of the M240E6 to provide sort of a recoil absorber system.
(For that matter, experiments are also being conducted with a lightweight
titanium/steel alloy tripod, though this is not covered here.) If they do get
fielded, it probably won’t be before 2008 at the earliest.
Twilight 2000
Notes: This weapon did not have much of a chance to be adopted; the Marines only
replaced about half of their M-60s with it, and the Army got almost none.
The post-2000 M240 variants do not exist in the Twilight 2000 timeline,
nor does the M240E6 in any version (and in fact, is not even in service in real
life as of early 2006).
Weapon |
Ammunition |
Weight |
Magazines |
Price |
M240 (pre-2000) |
7.62mm NATO |
12.25 kg |
100 Belt, 200 Belt |
$3219 |
M240 (post 2000) |
7.62mm NATO |
10.89 kg |
100 Belt, 200 Belt |
$3219 |
M240E6 (Current) |
7.62mm NATO |
10.44 kg |
100 Belt, 200 Belt |
$3256 |
M240E6 (Future) |
7.62mm NATO |
9.07 kg |
100 Belt, 200 Belt |
$3259 |
M240E6 (Future, with Improved Buffer) |
7.62mm NATO |
9.07 kg |
100 Belt, 200 Belt |
$3334 |
Weapon |
ROF |
Damage |
Pen |
Bulk |
SS |
Burst |
Range |
M240 (Pre/Post-2000) |
5/10 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
8 |
3 |
6/13 |
85 |
(With Bipod) |
5/10 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
8 |
1 |
3/6 |
110 |
(With Tripod) |
5/10 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
8 |
1 |
1/3 |
170 |
M240E6 (Current) |
5/10 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
8 |
3 |
6/13 |
85 |
(With Bipod) |
5/10 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
8 |
1 |
3/6 |
110 |
(With Tripod) |
5/10 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
8 |
1 |
1/3 |
170 |
M240E6 (Future) |
5/10 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
8 |
3 |
7/13 |
85 |
(With Bipod) |
5/10 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
8 |
1 |
3/7 |
110 |
(With Tripod) |
5/10 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
8 |
1 |
1/3 |
170 |
M240E6 (Improved Buffer) |
5/10 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
8 |
2 |
6/11 |
85 |
(With Bipod) |
5/10 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
8 |
1 |
3/6 |
110 |
(With Tripod) |
5/10 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
8 |
1 |
1/2 |
170 |
FNH USA Mk 48 Mod 0
Notes:
US Navy SEAL teams like the light weight of the M249; they also like the
firepower of the MAG (M240) and its 7.62mm NATO round.
What they don’t like is the relatively low hitting power of the 5.56mm
NATO round of the SAW, nor do they like the huge size and heavy weight of the
M240. They wanted a blend of the
two. They also didn’t like totally
like the M-60E3s they were currently using in the role, feeling that the M-60E3
was essentially a compromise what didn’t work out.
FN therefore
designed the Mk48 Mod 0 specifically for them.
It is basically an M249 scaled up to fire the 7.62mm NATO round.
(FN had sort of a head-start on this; it’s a little-known fact that the
Minimi was originally designed in both 5.56mm NATO and 7.62mm NATO versions.)
The SEALs were also given a few other things they asked for in a light
machinegun: Teflon coating for resistance to weather and salt water, a little
extra weight to keep barrel climb down, a quick-change barrel, and a stronger
build. The entire machinegun is, in
fact, only a little longer than the M16 assault rifle.
The Mk 49 Mod 0
is built largely of steel, with some light alloy components, and a polymer
pistol grip, stock, and fore-end.
It’s rumored that the stock can be replaced with a collapsing one, but I have
not been able to confirm this. The
standard stock has a shape similar to newer M249s with fixed stocks, making it
somewhat lighter. It uses standard NATO disintegrating-link belts, feeding from
the left and ejecting spent rounds through the bottom of the receiver.
The Mk 48 Mod 0 can be equipped with a total of five MIL-STD-1913 rails:
one atop the receiver/feed cover, three on the fore-end on the bottom and sides,
and one over the barrel where it rests on the fore-end.
The folding bipod is adjustable for height and cant.
The 16.5-inch barrel is tipped with a compact flash suppressor and the
bore is hard-chromed, as is the chamber.
The standard sights consist of a protected front post and a rear sight
similar to that of the MAG, an adjustable aperture rear which may be flipped up
to reveal an adjustable leaf.
Recently, a version of the Mk 48 Mod 0 with a suppressed barrel has been in use
in Iraq and Afghanistan, the suppressor design is similar to that mounted to
some versions of the Mk 46 Mod 0 automatic rifle, but larger and beefier.
Though there are
rumors of the deployment of the Mk 48 in Kosovo, the first confirmed use was in
Afghanistan. The US Army’s Rangers
have used it in the recent fighting in Iraq.
Though an FN design, the Mk 48 Mod 0 is actually manufactured in FN’s US
facilities in South Carolina.
Twilight 2000
Notes: This weapon does not exist in the Twilight 2000 timeline.
Weapon |
Ammunition |
Weight |
Magazines |
Price |
Mk
48 Mod 0 |
7.62mm NATO |
8.39 kg |
50
Belt, 100 Belt, 200 Belt |
$2216 |
Mk
48 Mod 0 (Suppressed) |
7.62mm NATO |
10.56 kg |
50
Belt, 100 Belt, 200 Belt |
$2862 |
Weapon |
ROF |
Damage |
Pen |
Bulk |
SS |
Burst |
Range |
Mk 48 Mod 0 |
10 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
7 |
3 |
13 |
47 |
(With Bipod) |
10 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
7 |
1 |
6 |
60 |
(With Tripod) |
10 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
7 |
1 |
3 |
93 |
Mk 48 Mod 0 (Suppressed) |
10 |
3 |
1-Nil |
10 |
1 |
7 |
28 |
(With Bipod) |
10 |
3 |
1-Nil |
10 |
1 |
4 |
37 |
(With Tripod) |
10 |
3 |
1-Nil |
10 |
1 |
2 |
57 |
Notes: This is
an electrically driven .50 caliber Gatling gun, capable of delivering a massive
volume of large-caliber fire. An optional gas drive may be added if external
power is undesirable, and the GAU-19 can also be driven from an air compressor.
It can fire both linked and linkless rounds.
Twilight 2000
Notes: The GAU-19 is made in a 3-barrel short version and a 6-barrel long
version. The 6-barreled version is
very rare.
Weapon |
Ammunition |
Weight |
Magazines |
Price |
GAU-19/A (3-Barrel) |
.50 Browning Machinegun |
33.6 kg |
1500 or 1500 Belt |
$14371 |
GAU-19/A (6-barrel) |
.50 Browning Machinegun |
49 kg |
1500 or 1500 Belt |
$21839 |
Weapon |
ROF |
Damage |
Pen |
Bulk |
SS |
Burst |
Range |
GAU-19/A (3-Barrel, Normal Ammo) |
30 |
9 |
2-3-4 |
7 |
1 |
5 |
275 |
GAU-19/A (3-Barrel, SLAP) |
30 |
9 |
1-2-3 |
7 |
1 |
5 |
330 |
GAU-19/A (6-Barrel, Normal Ammo) |
60 |
9 |
2-2-3 |
9 |
1 |
6 |
383 |
GAU-19/A (6-Barrel, SLAP) |
60 |
9 |
1-1-1 |
9 |
1 |
6 |
460 |
**This weapon is always found on a vehicular or heavy mount, and in this state
has negligible recoil.
US Ordnance M-60
Notes: The M-60
(originally designed and manufactured by Saco Defense, but later built by the
Maremont division of General Dynamics, and now built under license by US
Ordnance) began as an attempt to “Americanize” the Nazi MG-42 for use by US
troops. The MG-42 and FG-42 assault
rifle was then blended, and the feed system of the MG-42 was simplified, by
essentially combining the two-piece feed pawl of the MG-42 into a single unit.
In addition, the much of the action was moved into the stock, making the
M-60 into a compact, “semi-bullpup” design which is only 43.5 inches long in its
basic form.
The M-60 has a
mostly conventional, gas-operated firing system.
Feed is from the left, like most Western machineguns (though some
versions of the M-60 have been made at the request of certain customers to feed
from the left, mostly to fit in specific internal vehicle mounts).
The standard belt is a 100-round disintegrating link NATO-standard belt,
but I have personally seen M-60s in demonstrations which could pull in a
400-round hanging belt. The
100-round belt is usually contained in metal, plastic, or cardboard-lined canvas
containers for carrying by soldiers, or it can be fed from boxes set beside the
gun. The M-60 has always had a
quick-change barrel, but initial versions had no carrying handle, and asbestos
mitts were issued along with replacement barrels and cleaning kits in order to
allow the gunner or assistant gunner to change the barrel.
Later, a carrying handle attached to the barrel was added, but hot
barrels on the M-60 can be a bit balky, often requiring two hands to unlock
them, so the asbestos mitts continued to be issued.
Unfortunately, the front sight is a non-adjustable blade mounted on a
triangular mount that is attached directly to the barrel; this means that when
you change a barrel, the gunner loses the M-60’s zero.
The barrel itself is 22 inches long, tipped by a long flash suppressor,
and chrome-lined. The M-60 does not
have any sort of gas adjustment device; the system adjusts itself to fouling.
Though there is no semiautomatic setting, the cyclic rate is so slow
(about 550 rpm) that it only takes a minimum of practice to squeeze off single
shots. Though it is officially
frowned upon (at least by the US Army), one can actually load a belt into the
M-60 without raising the feed cover, though you have to insert and hold the belt
in place, brace the stock against your shoulder, stomach, or hip, and cycle the
charging handle twice instead of only once.
The folding bipod is also attached directly to barrel; it is a simple
affair, built mostly of stamped steel (it looks like aluminum to me, but I was
assured in the Army that it is made of steel).
The bipod is adjustable to a very limited extend for height and cant.
It can be mounted on a standard NATO Light Tripod, or on compatible
pintle mounts.
Reviews of the
basic M-60 by the troops have been mixed – they range from those who think it is
crap (some even call it “the Pig”) two those who like it so much they wish the
M240 hadn’t replaced it in the US military.
It is still used around the world by a lot of military forces.
(My personal opinion is that while changing hot barrels can be a bitch, I
still love the thing.)
Variants of the
basic M-60 include the M-60C, which is electrically fired and was designed
specifically for use on external helicopter mounts (especially early UH-1 Huey
helicopters converted for use as gunships in Vietnam before the advent of the
AH-1 Cobra). It is no longer in
production. The M-60D is an M-60
with the conventional trigger group and stock replaced with spade grips and a
thumb trigger; this version is designed for use as a helicopter door gun and
from certain fixed positions and vehicle pintle mounts.
The M-60E2 is another electrically-fired model, for use in internal
vehicle mounts. It is no longer in
production in the US, though some other countries (most notably Taiwan) still
make it.
The M-60E3 was
designed in the early 1980s by Saco at the request of US special operations
units (especially the SEALs), to provide them with a lighter, more versatile
version of the M-60. Saco also took
the opportunity to fix some of the M-60s problems.
The standard barrel is the same length as the standard M-60 (22 inches)
and is thicker than the M-60’s barrel, but it is also built from lighter and
stronger steel, so it is actually lighter than the standard M-60 barrel.
The M-60E3 can also use two other barrels:
a 17.36-inch short barrel, and a 16.65-inch assault barrel.
All three use a more compact flash suppressor than the standard M-60.
All three have an extended lower handguard made from polymer, with a
forward grip for control when firing from the hip; the upper part of the barrel
jacket has been deleted. The
carrying handle remains a part of the barrel, but the locking mechanism for the
barrel has been improved so one-handed barrel changing without mitts is assured.
The bipod has been moved to the front of the lower handguard, which
provides better balance. The bipod
is also made from lighter but stronger metal; it is physically smaller than a
standard M-60 bipod, but is not adjustable.
The M-60E3 retains the ability to be tripod or pintle-mounted. The M-60E3
is “officially” able to be loaded without raising the feed cover, and the
charging handle requires only one cycling to do this.
Standard M-60s must be loaded with the charging handle locked to the
rear; the M-60E3 can be loaded with the bolt open or closed. The M-60 feeds from
the same belts as the standard M-60, though US special ops troops are known to
often use 50-round belts during close assaults, and containers are made for
these shorter belts. The trigger
guard is enlarged to allow the M-60E3 to be fired by a gunner wearing heavy
gloves. The front sight is
adjustable for elevation and windage on the M-60E3.
A kit is also made, allowing standard M-60s to be converted to the M-60E3
configuration. In addition to use
by special ops units of the US military, the M-60E3 is listed as being in use by
“several foreign countries.”
The M-60E4 is
essentially a further-modified M-60E3, adding many features requested by US and
other countries’ special operations units.
The forward handguard is different; it has been replaced with one that
wraps around three sides of the barrel and gas tube, and has three wide
MIL-STD-1913 rails and two narrow ones on each side of the barrel itself.
The flash suppressor has been further modified so that it also acts as
muzzle brake. The bipod has been
strengthened, and also has a limited amount of adjustability for height and
cant. The front sight remains the
same as the M-60E3, but the rear iron sight has been moved to a position in
front of the feed cover, to allow room for a MIL-STD-1913 rail atop the feed
cover. Belt pull strength is 35%
greater, and in general, the M-60E4 is a much more robust weapon than the M-60E3
(user feedback brought complaints of the relative fragility of the M-60E3).
The M-60E4 can use the same barrels as the M-60E3; in a pinch, it can
also use a standard M-60 barrel.
The pistol grip is more ergonomic, and the attachment of the pistol grip and
trigger assembly has been modified, since some troops did complain that the
pistol grip/trigger mechanism would fall off during sustained fire.
The M-60E4 can also be modified for use with a spade grip/thumb trigger
or an electrical trigger for internal vehicle use.
US Ordinance also makes a kit to convert the M-60 or M-60E3 to the M-60E4
specification. The primary users of
the M-60E4 were the US Navy SEALs (who call it the Mk 43 Mod 0), though it has
been largely replaced by the FN Mk 48 Mod 0 (see Belgian Machineguns) in SEAL
use. The M-60E4 is also listed by
several sources as being used by “several unnamed parties.”
Twilight 2000
Notes: The M-60 is still the primary US GPMG, as the M240 (US version of the
MAG) did not have a chance to be adopted in large numbers except as a vehicular
weapon. The M-60E3 is a
fairly-common special ops weapon, especially in the US military, ROK Army,
Taiwanese Army and Marines, and the Thai Army and Marines.
The M-60E4, a relative latecomer, is a much rarer weapon, and most of
them are used by US special ops units; however, limited quantities are also used
by the British and Australian SAS.
Weapon |
Ammunition |
Weight |
Magazines |
Price |
M-60 |
7.62mm NATO |
11.07 kg |
100 Belt |
$2330 |
M-60E3 (Long Barrel) |
7.62mm NATO |
8.8 kg |
50 Belt, 100 Belt |
$2333 |
M-60E3 (Short Barrel) |
7.62mm NATO |
8.53 kg |
50 Belt, 100 Belt |
$2189 |
M-60E3 (Assault Barrel) |
7.62mm NATO |
8.21 kg |
50 Belt, 100 Belt |
$2167 |
M-60E4 (Long Barrel) |
7.62mm NATO |
10.48 kg |
50 Belt, 100 Belt |
$2371 |
M-60E4 (Short Barrel) |
7.62mm NATO |
10.21 kg |
50 Belt, 100 Belt |
$2228 |
M-60E4 (Assault Barrel) |
7.62mm NATO |
9.89 kg |
50 Belt, 100 Belt |
$2206 |
Barrel Set (3 Lengths) |
NA |
4.27 kg |
NA |
$1709 |
Weapon |
ROF |
Damage |
Pen |
Bulk |
SS |
Burst |
Range |
M-60 |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
7 |
3 |
6 |
64 |
(With Bipod) |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
7 |
1 |
3 |
84 |
(With Tripod) |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
7 |
1 |
1 |
129 |
M-60E3 (Long Barrel) |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
7 |
3 |
7 |
64 |
(With Bipod) |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
7 |
1 |
3 |
84 |
(With Tripod) |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
7 |
1 |
1 |
129 |
M-60E3 (Short Barrel) |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
6 |
3 |
7 |
45 |
(With Bipod) |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
6 |
1 |
3 |
59 |
(With Tripod) |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
6 |
1 |
1 |
90 |
M-60E3 (Assault Barrel) |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
6 |
3 |
7 |
42 |
(With Bipod) |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
6 |
1 |
3 |
55 |
(With Tripod) |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
6 |
1 |
1 |
85 |
M-60E4 (Long Barrel) |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
7 |
2 |
5 |
64 |
(With Bipod) |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
7 |
1 |
2 |
84 |
(With Tripod) |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
7 |
1 |
1 |
129 |
M-60E4 (Short Barrel) |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
6 |
2 |
5 |
45 |
(With Bipod) |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
6 |
1 |
2 |
59 |
(With Tripod) |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
6 |
1 |
1 |
90 |
M-60E4 (Assault Barrel) |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
6 |
2 |
5 |
42 |
(With Bipod) |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
6 |
1 |
2 |
55 |
(With Tripod) |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
6 |
1 |
1 |
85 |
GE M-85
Notes: The M-85
is a heavy machinegun designed for coaxial and cupola use; it equipped the
commander’s cupolas of the M-60 series of tanks and the AAPV-7, amongst other
vehicles. Though still found on the
AAPV-7 series and such older vehicles, it has largely been withdrawn from
service in the US and in most other countries.
The M-85 is a
recoil-operated machinegun fed by standard .50 BMG disintegrating link belts.
Cocking is done by pulling back on handles on either side of the gun
(connected by chains to the gun).
It is normally used on vehicles, and is in that case fired by solenoid connected
to a firing switch (with a hand trigger backup).
It can also be mounted on a standard M2HB tripod and fired from it, but
in actual practice this was quite rare.
The M-85 has a dual rate of fire; normally, the gun is kept at the ground
target cyclic rate of 400 RPM, but it can also be switched to a ROF of 1050 RPM
for use against aircraft or a large amount of targets.
The fire selector is a dial-type on the rear of the gun.
No provision is made for semiautomatic fire, but when set for the lower
ROF, single shots or short burst are easily squeezed off.
The barrel length is 36 inches, and the muzzle is tipped by a large flash
suppressor. No sights or sight
mounts are provided, since its primary use is as a vehicle weapon.
Weapon |
Ammunition |
Weight |
Magazines |
Price |
M-85 |
.50
Browning Machinegun |
27.9 kg |
105B |
$13707 |
Weapon |
ROF |
Damage |
Pen |
Bulk |
SS |
Burst |
Range |
M-85 (Vehicular Mount) |
5/10 |
9 |
2-3-4 |
9 |
* |
* |
276 |
M-85 (Tripod Mount) |
5/10 |
9 |
2-3-4 |
9 |
4 |
11/21 |
276 |
GE/Dillon Aero M134 Minigun
Notes: The M134
is basically an electric Gatling gun, a six-barreled machinegun with an electric
motor. Development of these modern
“electric Gatling guns” started shortly after World War 2, and the first of
these was the famous 20mm M-61 Vulcan series, but early in the US involvement in
Vietnam, the Army realized that a scaled-down version of the Vulcan would be
wonderful for providing massive volumes of fire when used as helicopter
armament. They were first mounted
on the various ad hoc UH-1 Huey
gunships deployed, and then on the first AH-1 Cobra gunships.
Quickly, mounts were designed to allow the M134 to be used on pintle
mounts as helicopter door guns, on patrol boats, in pods on light aircraft and
helicopters, and of course, the famous AC-47 “Puff” gunships.
The cyclic rate of fire for the original M134s was originally set at 4000
rpm, and the rotating six-barreled configuration kept the barrels from
overheating because each barrel essentially had a much lower rate of fire.
Later versions of the M134 could be set for later rates of fire, ranging
from short 10, 50, and 100-round bursts to twin rates of fire of either 3000 or
6000 rpm; this is the rate of fire for most “current: GE-built M134s, with the
burst length essentially controlled by how long the trigger is depressed.
(A skilled gunner is capable of squeezing off 100-round bursts, and I’ve
even heard of some gunners able to squeeze off bursts as small as 50 rounds when
the Minigun is set on its 3000 rpm setting).
The reason I
wrote “current” GE-built models because GE no longer builds the original M134s
(they built the last one in 1975) – in fact, parts for original M134s are not
even being made in the US anymore.
Some can be procured from countries still making these parts, but as far as I’ve
been able to discover, complete M134s in their original configuration are not
being made anywhere anymore, and most countries that still make spare parts will
not sell them to civilians or even directly to military forces – a country’s
government has to ask for them.
Most parts available in the US these days are the result of cannibalization or
their being made from scratch in machine shops.
The GE-built
M134 is, as all modern Gatling-type guns, electrically powered from the vehicle
in which it is mounted or an external power source; potentially any external
power source may be used, from a battery pack to a generator, but it must be
able to provide 28-Volt DC or 115-Volt AC power at 260 amps (though sustained
fire requires only 130 amps). If
the length of an ammunition belt exceeds 1.5 meters in length, an additional
electrical motor must be added at the top of the ammunition chute to provide
more belt-pulling power. In
addition to their use as aircraft, helicopter, and internal vehicle armament,
M134s can be mounted on pintle mounts, used as helicopter door guns (a very
common method of use), or even mounted on standard heavy tripods of various
sorts, including those designed for use with heavy machineguns such as the M2HB
and Mk-19 automatic grenade launchers.
(I even have a picture of three Miniguns on a single ground mount.)
Feed may be from either side; belt length is effectively unlimited, but
the normal lengths of belt used with manually-operated M134s are listed below.
If special ammunition boxes and feed chutes are used, the M134 can be fed
from unlinked ammunition. The
length of each barrel is 22 inches; the barrels are normally parallel, but
barrel clamps are available that allow a variable convergence point.
Individual barrels are heavy, designed to fire at least 40,000 rounds
between failures (some say as much as 100,000 rounds).
However, 1975
was not the end of US M134 production.
US special operations units still loved the Minigun, but theirs were
rapidly wearing out by the early 1990s.
There were still a lot of M134s used as door guns, armament on foreign
helicopters, and even by some variants of the AC-130.
GE was no longer tooled-up to produce the M134 or its parts, and they
were unwilling to re-establish the production line for the Minigun.
Parts could be obtained to a certain extent by cannibalization or by
buying them from foreign sources, but this essentially reduced the supply of
available Miniguns and buying parts from foreign sources was much more expensive
than having a domestic supplier. A
company in Arizona called Dillon Aero stepped up to the plate, they essentially
bought the complete rights to production and sale of the M134 from GE.
At the same time, they took the opportunity to correct a number of small
deficiencies with the M134, as well as simplifying the design and improving its
reliability. The result was the
M134D. Externally, the M134 largely
resembles the original M134; internally, the M134D is a very different weapon.
The original magazine hoppers and feed mechanism have been redesigned to
allow slightly greater capacity, eliminate unnecessary parts, and the actual
belt feed repositioned to the top so that weight of the belt pull is minimized.
A small electrical booster was also added to the feed mechanism,
eliminating the need for a separate electrical motor if very long belts or feed
chutes are used. A common cause of
jamming on the original M134 was misaligned rounds (especially when unlinked
rounds were used); this problem has been eliminated.
Spent rounds and duds are ejected from the bottom of the M134D, where
they can be ejected outside of the vehicle or aircraft or collected in an
attached container (or simply fall on the ground).
A mechanism has been added which essentially spins the barrels backwards
for a fraction of a second in the case of a stoppage, in order to eject the
stuck round or case. The M134D uses
coatings and other modifications to reduce friction and increase tolerance to
dirt. The bolt is strengthened by
building it from a nickel-steel alloy instead of standard steel.
Further modifications to the M134D’s bolt helps ensure that the firing
pin consistently strikes the primer (another problem with the original M134).
Variable cyclic rate mechanisms have been removed, and the M134D fires
only at 3000 rpm (mostly to stop wasteful ammunition usage).
Normally, manually-fired M134Ds have no sights (aim is to be corrected by
tracers), but sights can be added.
The amount of possible mountings for the M134D (and other Dillon M134s) are so
vast that they cannot all be mentioned here; they have even modified a Chevy
Suburban to fire a Dillon M134 out of the rear!
Dillon has
recently designed a new version of the M134D, called the M134D-T.
Designed to reduce weight, the M134D-T uses some skeletonized components
where possible, but most of the weight reduction has come from replacing the
rotor, housing, parts of the feed mechanism, and the barrel clamp/flash
suppressor with versions made from titanium instead of steel.
In all cases,
Dillon Miniguns can be had with three lengths of barrels: the standard 22-inch
barrel, a heavy 22-inch barrel, and a short 18-inch barrel.
Currently, Dillon does not built tripods or soft mounts for their
Miniguns, but they can still use M2HB tripods and soft mounts, as well as
a large amount of pintle mounts, internal aircraft and helicopter mounts, pods,
internal and pintle vehicle mounts, boat and ship mounts, and even on mounts
like the new remote weapons stations.
It has even been used successfully with some of the experimental combat
robots DARPA is testing. Dillon
also offers rebuild kits to convert existing M134s to the M134D or M134D-T
specifications.
Statistics below
are for Miniguns mounted designed for mounting on tripods or pintle mounts;
Miniguns designed for internal vehicular, helicopter, or aircraft use are
typically 4-6 kilograms lighter (depending upon the installation type).
The weight includes a typical power source and electrical motors (but, as
usual, not a tripod).
Since the early
Vietnam War, the M134 has been available in a pod which can be attached to
various aircraft. The Army called
it the M18; the Air Force called it the SUU-11/A.
The firing tables are identical to those below for the M134; the pod has
its own separate weight and cost difference. The only difference in the firing
tables is that there is no Recoil factor.
Case ejection is downward, about one-third back from the front.
Twilight 2000
Notes: M134D development and production was dramatically ramped up prior to the
Twilight War; in addition, Dillon agreed to make spare parts for older M134s in
addition to making conversion kits.
The M134D-T does not exist in the Twilight 2000 timeline.
Weapon |
Ammunition |
Weight |
Magazines |
Price |
M134 |
7.62mm NATO |
33.76 kg |
1000 Belt, 1500 Belt, 4000 Belt |
$7945 |
M134D (Standard Barrels) |
7.62mm NATO |
29.98 kg |
500 Belt, 1000 Belt, 1500 Belt, 4000 Belt, 4400 Belt |
$6622 |
M134D (Heavy Barrels) |
7.62mm NATO |
31.07 kg |
500 Belt, 1000 Belt, 1500 Belt, 4000 Belt, 4400 Belt |
$6824 |
M134D (Short Barrels) |
7.62mm NATO |
28.35 kg |
500 Belt, 1000 Belt, 1500 Belt, 4000 Belt, 4400 Belt |
$5889 |
M134D-T (Standard Barrels) |
7.62mm NATO |
24.09 kg |
500 Belt, 1000 Belt, 1500 Belt, 4000 Belt, 4400 Belt |
$6681 |
M134D-T (Heavy Barrels) |
7.62mm NATO |
25.18 kg |
500 Belt, 1000 Belt, 1500 Belt, 4000 Belt, 4400 Belt |
$6883 |
M134D-T (Short Barrels) |
7.62mm NATO |
22.46 kg |
500 Belt, 1000 Belt, 1500 Belt, 4000 Belt, 4400 Belt |
$5948 |
M18 Pod |
7.62mm NATO |
147.14 kg |
1500 Linkless Feed |
$15890 |
Weapon |
ROF |
Damage |
Pen |
Bulk |
SS |
Burst |
Range |
M134* |
30/60 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
8 |
** |
4/12 |
143 |
M134D (Standard Barrel)* |
30 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
8 |
** |
4 |
143 |
M134D (Heavy Barrel)* |
30 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
8 |
** |
4 |
154 |
M134D (Short Barrel) |
30 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
7 |
** |
4 |
106 |
M134D-T (Standard Barrel)* |
30 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
8 |
** |
4 |
143 |
M134D-T (Heavy Barrel)* |
30 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
8 |
** |
4 |
154 |
M134D-T (Short Barrel) |
30 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
7 |
** |
4 |
106 |
M1919A4/M1919A6
Notes: This
weapon grew out of John Browning’s experiments with recoil operation for
automatic weapons. He had the basic
design for the M1919 series finished by 1910, but wasn’t able to get any
government interested until World War 1 became thick in 1917.
The M1919A4 is a
development of John Browning’s earlier M1917 design; it is basically an M1917
without the water cooling jacket around the barrel.
This allowed it to be made much lighter, and it became virtually the
definitive support weapon for US troops during World War 2.
The M1919A6 was
an attempt to make the M1919A4 into a squad automatic weapon.
The M1919A6 is fitted with a stock, pistol grip, and quick-change barrel
and is made from lighter materials. It has a bipod and can be fired from a
tripod (NLT). It was a poor attempt at a GPMG and was never popular.
When the SEALs
first arrived in Vietnam, a commonly-available weapon was the ancient M1919A4.
These weapons, while somewhat useful, were generally unacceptable to the
SEALs, with their then-odd caliber ammunition (for military purposes) and rather
worn condition. The SEALs began a
modernization program for the M1919A4, for use on their patrol and assault
boats. The modernization consisted
of a change to 7.62mm NATO caliber and other modifications to the gun necessary
to fire this weapon and accommodate the belts; a long, slotted flash suppressor,
and more modern sights. This
modified weapon was designated the Mk 21 Mod 0.
In 2005, the
company of Barrel X Change began offering a conversion kit for the M1919A4 to
allow it to fire 7.62mm Kalashnikov ammunition.
This enables it to fire the mounds of cheap Russian and former Eastern
Bloc ammunition flooding the market.
This conversion makes no permanent changes to the M1919A4. The kit itself
consists of a barrel, a bolt, a booster nut, a front cartridge stop, a modified
top cover extractor spring, a modified recoil spring, and 100 links for 7.62mm
Kalashnikov ammunition.
In late 2008,
The Rollin Lofdahl Company made a duel-feed adaptation kit for the M1919A4.
Other than the duel-feed capability, and a premium of $10, this is
identical to the standard M1919A4.
It is only for .30-06 Springfield-firing guns.
Twilight
2000/Merc 2000 Notes: Despite its age, these weapons (especially the M1919A4)
continue to soldier on, often converted to 7.62mm NATO.
The 7.62mm Kalashnikov conversion, however, does not exist.
Weapon |
Ammunition |
Weight |
Magazines |
Price |
M1919A4 |
.30-06 Springfield |
14.05 kg |
100 Belt, 250 Belt |
$2775 |
M1919A6 |
.30-06 Springfield |
14.73 kg |
100 Belt, 250 Belt |
$2785 |
Mk 21 Mod 0 |
7.62mm NATO |
16.33 kg |
100 Belt |
$2445 |
M1919A4 |
7.62mm Kalashnikov |
12.94 kg |
100 Belt |
$2045 |
Weapon |
ROF |
Damage |
Pen |
Bulk |
SS |
Burst |
Range |
M1919A4 (.30-06, Tripod) |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
6 |
1 |
1 |
142 |
M1919A6 |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
8 |
2 |
6 |
71 |
M1919A6 (Bipod) |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
8 |
1 |
3 |
92 |
M1919A6 (Tripod) |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
8 |
1 |
1 |
142 |
Mk 21 Mod 0 (Tripod) |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
8 |
1 |
1 |
163 |
M1919A4 (7.62mm Kalashnikov, Tripod) |
5 |
4 |
2-3-Nil |
6 |
1 |
1 |
146 |
RAMO Lightweight M2
Notes: As
implied by the name, this is an improved, light version of the Browning M2HB.
In addition to a QCB barrel, the RAMO Lightweight M2 uses a shorter,
lighter barrel, an adjustable rate of fire, and some lighter components.
However, 75% of the parts of this weapon are interchangeable with the
standard Browning M2HB.
Twilight 2000
Notes: This weapon exists only in very small numbers.
Ammunition |
Weight |
Magazines |
Price |
|
RAMO Lightweight M2 |
.50
Browning Machinegun |
26.72 kg |
110
Belt |
$13811 |
Weapon |
ROF |
Damage |
Pen |
Bulk |
SS |
Burst |
Range |
RAMO Lightweight M2 (Normal Ammo) |
5/10 |
9 |
2-3-4 |
10 |
1 |
3/5 |
275 |
RAMO Lightweight M2 (SLAP) |
5/10 |
9 |
1-2-3 |
10 |
1 |
3/5 |
330 |
Saco Fifty/.50
Notes: This is
one of several upgraded versions of the M2HB. Improvements include an adjustable
fire rate (from 500 to 750 rounds per minute), while retaining the semiautomatic
fire capability. The receiver has
been strengthened by replacing most of the riveted construction with welding;
this has also lightened the weapon.
The charging handle is much easier to pull back than on the standard M2HB.
Most importantly, the need for the tedious headspace and timing
adjustments of the standard M2HB have been eliminated, making the weapon easier
to maintain and more reliable.
There is a short muzzle break on the end of the barrel.
Weapon |
Ammunition |
Weight |
Magazines |
Price |
Saco Fifty/.50 |
.50
Browning Machinegun |
25
kg |
110
Belt |
$14136 |
Weapon |
ROF |
Damage |
Pen |
Bulk |
SS |
Burst |
Range |
Saco Fifty/.50 (Normal Ammo) |
3/5 |
9 |
2-2-3 |
11 |
1 |
1/2 |
383 |
Saco Fifty/.50 (SLAP) |
3/5 |
9 |
1-1-1 |
11 |
1 |
1/2 |
460 |
Stoner 63A MMG (M207)
Notes:
The M207 was the only version of the Stoner officially type-standardized
by the US Army, and was also used by the Navy.
It is basically a larger version of the Stoner 63A series that uses a
longer barrel, belt-feed exclusively, and extra rails for vision equipment.
It has a provision for mounting on a tripod.
It is perhaps easier to find these days than other members of the family,
but is still a museum or collector’s piece.
Twilight 2000
Notes: As with other members of the M-63A family, improved versions showed up in
the hands of SEALs and Marines during the Twilight War.
Weapon |
Ammunition |
Weight |
Magazines |
Price |
M207 |
5.56mm NATO |
6.9
kg |
100
Belt, 150 Belt, 250 Belt |
$1492 |
Weapon |
ROF |
Damage |
Pen |
Bulk |
SS |
Burst |
Range |
M207 |
10 |
3 |
1-Nil |
7 |
2 |
8 |
62 |
M207 (Bipod) |
10 |
3 |
1-Nil |
7 |
1 |
4 |
81 |
M207 (Tripod) |
10 |
3 |
1-Nil |
7 |
1 |
2 |
124 |
Tippman Miniature
M1919A4
Notes: This is a
“novelty gun,” designed for collectors more than for any sort of serious combat
use. It is, as the name suggests, a
vastly scaled down Browning M1919A4, firing .22 Long Rifle instead of .30-06.
The Tippman Miniature breaks down and is cleaned almost exactly like the
original, and fires just like the original.
It is not meant to be a serious firearm, just something to have fun with.
Because of its construction, it is very clumsy to fire apart from its
tripod (-3 to hit).
Twilight 2000
Notes: This weapon does not exist.
Weapon |
Ammunition |
Weight |
Magazines |
Price |
Miniature M1919A4 |
.22
Long Rifle |
3.9
kg |
25,
50, 100, 150, 200, 250 Cloth Belt |
$513 |
Weapon |
ROF |
Damage |
Pen |
Bulk |
SS |
Burst |
Range |
Miniature M1919A4 |
5 |
1 |
Nil |
3 |
2 |
4 |
70 |
With Tripod |
5 |
1 |
Nil |
3 |
1 |
1 |
139 |